The Applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre­existing non-conforming lot.

The applicant proposes to raze the existing commercial office building and construct a new office building, as shown on the plans submitted.

The applicant proposes to renovate and rehabilitate the existing circa 1920 structure and construct a new addition.

The applicant proposes to modify an existing ZBA Decision (2003-080) to enclose the pre-existing non-conforming deck and further to construct an addition.

The applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot. Applicant has requested this application be continued without testimony until the July 2024 meeting.

The Applicant request approval of a Special Permit (Natick Zoning Bylaws, § IV-B.aa (footnotes)) for the creation of a Family Suite (the "Application").

The Applicant request approval of a Section 6 Finding (MGL c. 40A, § 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, § IV-B and§ V-A). The Applicant proposes to enclose an existing non-conforming deck.

The Applicant request approval of a Section 6 Finding (MGL c. 40A, § 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, § IV-B and § V-A). The Applicant proposes to construct a new addition.

The Applicant request approval of a Section 6 Finding (MGL c. 40A, § 6 and the· Natick Zoning Bylaws, § IV-B and § V-A). The Applicant proposes to raze the existing single ­family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot.

The Applicant request approval of a Section 6 Finding (MGL c. 40A, § 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, § IV-B and § V-A). The Applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot.

The Applicant request approval of a Section 6 Finding (MGL c. 40A, § 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, § IV-B and § V-A). The Applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot.

The Applicant request approval of a Section 6 Finding (MGL c. 40A, § 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, § IV-B and § V-A). The Applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot;

The Applicant request approval of a Section 6 Finding (MGL c. 40A, § 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, § IV-B and § V-A). The Applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot.

The applicant proposes to raze the existing commercial office building and construct a new office building, as shown on the plans submitted.

The applicant proposes to renovate and rehabilitate the existing circa 1920 structure and construct a new addition.

The Applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre­existing non-conforming lot.

The project is for the construction of an addition to a pre-existing non-conforming structure.

The applicant proposes to modify an existing ZBA Decision (2003-080) to enclose the pre-existing non-conforming deck and further to construct an addition.

The project is for a standing teardown, which includes the construction of an addition to a pre­-existing non-conforming structure.

The project is for the construction of an addition on the rear of a residential structure located on a pre-existing non­conforming structure located on a pre-existing non-conforming lot.

The applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot.

The applicant proposes to raze the existing commercial office building and construct a new office building, as shown on the plans submitted.

May 20, 2024 Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) Meeting Item #1 - The applicant proposes to construct an addition adding a second story and attic, as shown on the plans submitted.

The applicant proposes to construct an addition.

The applicant proposes to renovate and rehabilitate the existing circa 1920 structure and construct a new addition.

The applicant proposes to construct an addition and garage replacing the existing deck.

The applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot.

An application for Route 135 LLC for a Finding per Massachusetts General Law (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, Sections IV-B and V-A AND three (3) Variances per Massachusetts General Law (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 10 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, Sections IV-B and V-A. The project is for the expansion of the existing structure and construction of a new retail building, as shown on the plans submitted.

An application for Erin Wright for a Finding per Massachusetts General Law (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, Sections IV-B and V-A. The applicant proposes to raze the existing single-family dwelling and construct a new single-family dwelling on the pre-existing non-conforming lot, as shown on the plans submitted.

An application for Stephen Hall for a Finding per Massachusetts General Law (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, Sections IV-B and V-A. The applicant proposes to construct an addition, as shown on the plans submitted.

An application for Derick Joyner for a Finding per Massachusetts General Law (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, Sections IV-B and V-A. The project is for the demolition of the existing single-family dwelling and construction of a new single-family home on the pre-existing non-conforming lot, as shown on the plans submitted.

An application for Charles Patterson for a Finding per Massachusetts General Law (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, Sections IV-B and V-A. The applicant proposes to construct an front addition and a covered portico, as shown on the plans submitted.

An application for 79 Speen Street LLC for a VARIANCE per Massachusetts General Law (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 10. The applicant proposes to raze the existing commercial office building and construct a new office building, as shown on the plans submitted.

An application for Stilwell Brooke for a VARIANCE per Massachusetts General Law (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 6 and the Natick Zoning Bylaws, Sections IV-B and V-A. The applicant proposes to remove an existing deck and construct a new deck, as shown on the plans submitted.